paper.dinq.meAI 与前沿科学顶会 · 学术新星雷达
登录 DINQ
返回新星榜
YZ

Yi Zhu

COLM 2026×2评测与基准安全多语言与语言学多模态社会与人本
新星分贡献者
34
一作贡献0
核心/参与10
方向广度10
合作网络3
0 一作 · 2 篇 · COLM 2026

获取完整研究档案

首次获取该候选人的完整档案及 StartLux 评估共 20 积分;每位用户单独解锁,之后查看免费。主动刷新 20 积分。

联系方式

实时查找电子邮箱,费用不超过20积分;未找到邮箱不扣费。

2026 顶会论文

2
作者位次 #9/11COLM 2026Poster· Poster Session 5· Grand Ballroom· #139

Back to Basics: Revisiting ASR in the Age of Voice Agents

Geeyang Tay · Wentao Ma · Jaewon Lee · Yuzhi Tang · Daniel Lee · Weisu Yin · Dongming Shen · Silin Meng · Yi Zhu · Mu Li · Alex Smola

We introduce WildASR, a multilingual benchmark constructed exclusively from real human speech source to stress-test ASR systems under a diverse set of OOD conditions.

摘要

Automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems have achieved near-human accuracy on curated benchmarks, yet still fail in real-world voice agents under conditions that current evaluations do not systematically cover. Without diagnostic tools that isolate specific failure factors, practitioners cannot anticipate which conditions, in which languages, will cause what degree of degradation. We introduce WildASR, a multilingual (four-language) diagnostic benchmark sourced entirely from real human speech that factorizes ASR robustness along three axes: environmental degradation, demographic shift, and linguistic diversity. Evaluating seven widely used ASR systems, we find severe and uneven performance degradation, and model robustness does not transfer across languages or conditions. Critically, models often hallucinate plausible but unspoken content under partial or degraded inputs, creating concrete safety risks for downstream agent behavior. Our results demonstrate that targeted, factor-isolated evaluation is essential for understanding and improving ASR reliability in production systems. Besides the benchmark itself, we also present three analytical tools that practitioners can use to guide deployment decisions.

安全评测与基准多语言与语言学Automatic speech recognitionOut-of-distributionDiagnoseRobustnessOpenReview
作者位次 #18/20COLM 2026Poster· Poster Session 4· Franciscan C· #94

Instruct-FD: Can Your Full-Duplex Speech System Follow Turn-Taking Instructions?

Yuzhi Tang · Wentao Ma · Xiling Zhao · Ahmad Salimi · Sepehr Harfi Moridani · Dongming Shen · Jixuan Wang · Abdulrahman Abdulrazzag · Murdock Aubry · Yu-Hua Chen · Daniel Lee · Jaewon Lee · Jonah Mackey · Silin Meng · Nicholas Stranges · Chenxu Xiong · Hao Yu · Yi Zhu · Mu Li · Alex Smola

We introduce Instruct-FD, a benchmark for testing whether full-duplex speech systems can follow explicit turn-taking instructions, and show that even top models (best: 64.4% adherence) still struggle to controllably manage turn-taking behavior.

摘要

Current full-duplex (FD) spoken dialogue systems can produce fluid interactions, yet it remains unclear whether they can adapt their turn-taking behavior when explicitly instructed. This is critical for real-world deployment, where conversational policies vary across applications (e.g., proactive tutoring vs. passive counseling). We introduce Instruct-FD, an instruction-conditioned benchmark for evaluating controllable turn management in FD systems. To enable this, we develop a human-validated, scalable synthetic pipeline that generates instruction-conditioned conversations, along with a deployment-agnostic multi-turn evaluation protocol and an LLM-based judge. Benchmarking six state-of-the-art full-duplex systems reveals a substantial gap in instruction-following turn management: the best model achieves only 64.4\% adherence. Performance is highly uneven across behaviors and scenarios, with proactive behaviors such as model backchanneling and interruption remaining particularly challenging. These findings establish instruction-following turn management as a crucial direction for building adaptable and deployable full-duplex dialogue systems.

评测与基准多模态社会与人本Full-duplex spoken dialogueEvaluationAudioBenchmarkOpenReview

常见合作者