paper.dinq.meAI 与前沿科学顶会 · 学术新星雷达
登录 DINQ
返回新星榜
WA

Waseem Alshikh

COLM 2026推理强化学习与后训练效率与系统
新星分资深
6
一作贡献0
核心/参与0
方向广度6
合作网络0
0 一作 · 1 篇 · COLM 2026

获取完整研究档案

首次获取该候选人的完整档案及 StartLux 评估共 20 积分;每位用户单独解锁,之后查看免费。主动刷新 20 积分。

联系方式

实时查找电子邮箱,费用不超过20积分;未找到邮箱不扣费。

2026 顶会论文

1
作者位次 #4/4COLM 2026Poster· Poster Session 5· Franciscan C· #99

Shorthand for Thought: Compressing LLM Reasoning via Entropy-Guided Supertokens

Zhenyu Zhao · Sander Land · Daniel M. Bikel · Waseem Alshikh

We learn supertokens from LLM reasoning traces via entropy-guided BPE, compressing output by 8.1% with no accuracy loss while uncovering an interpretable move-level structure that distinguishes productive reasoning from unresolvable confusion loops.

摘要

Reasoning in Large Language Models incurs significant inference-time compute, yet the token-level information structure of reasoning traces remains underexplored. We observe that reasoning tokens split into two functional types: low-entropy \textit{structural} tokens (recurring phrases that scaffold the reasoning process) and higher-entropy \textit{organic} tokens (problem-specific content that drives toward a solution). This asymmetry motivates a simple, model-agnostic compression pipeline: apply cross-word BPE merges on a model's own reasoning traces to derive \textit{supertokens} that capture frequent structural patterns, then teach the model to adopt them via supervised fine-tuning. Across three model families and five mathematical reasoning benchmarks, our approach shortens reasoning traces by 8.1\% on average; under a TOST equivalence analysis at a $\pm 2$~pp margin, accuracy is equivalent or inconclusive on 13/15 model--benchmark cells (2 pass equivalence, 11 inconclusive, predominantly AIME at $N{=}30$), with non-equivalent degradation on 2/15 cells (DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B on MATH-500 and OlympiadBench). Beyond compression, learned supertokens often align with interpretable reasoning moves such as backtracking, verification, and strategy shifts. This enables a compact structural analysis of reasoning traces: correct traces show more recovery and verification patterns, while incorrect traces show more repeated hedging and unresolved counterarguments. We release the full pipeline as open-source code.\footnote{Code available at \url{https://github.com/Writer/shorthand-for-thought}.}

推理强化学习与后训练效率与系统Chain-of-Thought ReasoningReasoning CompressionTokenizationInference EfficiencyOpenReview

常见合作者