paper.dinq.meAI 与前沿科学顶会 · 学术新星雷达
登录 DINQ
返回新星榜
JW

John Frederick Wieting

COLM 2026社会与人本推理智能体与工具
新星分资深
9
一作贡献0
核心/参与0
方向广度6
合作网络3
0 一作 · 1 篇 · COLM 2026

获取完整研究档案

首次获取该候选人的完整档案及 StartLux 评估共 20 积分;每位用户单独解锁,之后查看免费。主动刷新 20 积分。

联系方式

实时查找电子邮箱,费用不超过20积分;未找到邮箱不扣费。

2026 顶会论文

1
作者位次 #4/4COLM 2026Poster· Poster Session 3· Imperial Ballroom· #5

StoryScope: Investigating idiosyncrasies in AI fiction

Jenna Russell · Rishanth Rajendhran · Mohit Iyyer · John Frederick Wieting

We introduce StoryScope, a pipeline that automatically extracts 304 narrative features from 61K+ stories, and show that AI fiction can be distinguished from human writing by narrative structure alone, without relying on stylistic signals.

摘要

As AI-generated fiction becomes increasingly prevalent, questions of authorship and originality are becoming central to how written work is evaluated. While most existing work in this space focuses on identifying surface-level signatures of AI writing (e.g., word choice, syntactic structure), we ask instead whether AI-generated stories can be distinguished from human ones *without relying on stylistic signals*, focusing on discourse-level narrative choices such as character agency and chronological discontinuity. We propose StoryScope, a pipeline that automatically induces a fine-grained, interpretable feature space of discourse-level narrative features across 10 dimensions (e.g., plot, agents, temporal structure). We apply StoryScope to a parallel corpus of 10,272 writing prompts, each written by a human author and five LLMs, yielding 61,608 stories, each ~5,000 words, and 304 extracted features per story. Narrative features alone achieve 93.2\% macro-F1 for human vs. AI detection and 68.4% macro-F1 for six-way authorship attribution, retaining over 97\% of the performance of models that include stylistic cues. A compact set of 30 *core* narrative features captures much of this signal: AI stories over-explain themes and favor tidy, single-track plots while human stories frame protagonist' choices as more morally ambiguous and have increased temporal complexity (e.g., flashbacks, nonlinear structure). Per-model *fingerprint* features enable six-way attribution: for example, Claude produces notably flat event escalation, GPT over-indexes on dream sequences, and Gemini defaults to external character description. We find that AI-generated stories cluster in a shared region of narrative space, while human-authored stories exhibit greater diversity. More broadly, these results suggest that differences in underlying narrative construction, not just writing style, can be used to separate human-written original works from AI-generated fiction. We release the StoryScope code, 10,272 writing prompts, and 51,336 AI-generated narratives to support future work on narrative analysis and AI authorship.

社会与人本推理智能体与工具AI-generated text detectionnarrative structureauthorship attributioncreative writingOpenReview

常见合作者