paper.dinq.meAI 与前沿科学顶会 · 学术新星雷达
登录 DINQ
返回新星榜
AT

Ari Trachtenberg

COLM 2026安全评测与基准理论与学习动力学
新星分贡献者
28
一作贡献0
核心/参与12
方向广度6
合作网络0
0 一作 · 1 篇 · COLM 2026

获取完整研究档案

首次获取该候选人的完整档案及 StartLux 评估共 20 积分;每位用户单独解锁,之后查看免费。主动刷新 20 积分。

联系方式

实时查找电子邮箱,费用不超过20积分;未找到邮箱不扣费。

2026 顶会论文

1
作者位次 #2/3COLM 2026Poster· Poster Session 4· Imperial Ballroom· #2

A Prior-Aware Metric for Efficiently Distinguishing Memorization from Generalization in Large Language Models

Trishita Tiwari · Ari Trachtenberg · G. Edward Suh

"Prior-Aware Memorization" is a training-free metric that distinguishes genuine training data memorization from statistical commonality by evaluating suffix-prefix associations against general model priors.

摘要

Training data leakage from Large Language Models (LLMs) raises serious concerns related to privacy, security, and copyright compliance. A central challenge in assessing this risk is distinguishing prefix-specific memorization of training data from the generation of statistically common sequences. Existing approaches to measuring memorization often conflate these phenomena, labeling outputs as memorized even when they arise from generalization over common patterns. Counterfactual memorization and other related metrics \citep{zhang2023counterfactual, wang2025generalization, lesci2024causal} provide principled solutions, however, their reliance on retraining multiple baseline models or parsing through the training data makes them computationally impractical at scale. This work introduces \emph{Prior-Aware memorization}, a theoretically grounded, lightweight and training-free criterion for identifying prefix-specific memorization in LLMs. The key idea is to evaluate whether a candidate suffix is strongly associated with its specific training prefix or whether it appears with high probability across many IID sampled sequences from the training data distribution due to statistical commonality. We correlate our metric with counterfactual memorization, and also evaluate it on the training corpora of two pre-trained models, LLaMA and OPT. Our results show that between 55\% and 90\% of sequences previously labeled as memorized fail our criterion and are consistent with statistical commonality

安全评测与基准理论与学习动力学Training Data Memorization; Privacy; CopyrightOpenReview

常见合作者