Isabelle Lee

Large language models (LLMs) can perform remarkably complex tasks, yet the fine-grained details of how these capabilities emerge during pretraining remain poorly understood. Scaling laws on validation loss tell us how much a model improves with additional compute, but not what skills it acquires in which order. To study this, we propose the \emph{Implicit Curriculum Hypothesis}: behavioral onsets during ordinary pretraining exhibit a structured, compositional ordering across models and data mixtures. We test this by designing a suite of simple, composable tasks spanning retrieval, morphological transformations, coreference, logical reasoning, and mathematics. Using these tasks, we track behavioral onset, the first checkpoint at which performance crosses a threshold, across four model families spanning sizes from 410M-13B parameters. We find that onset orderings under fixed accuracy thresholds are strikingly consistent ($\rho = .81$ across 45 model pairs), and that composite tasks most often emerge after their component tasks. Furthermore, we find that this structure is encoded in model representations: tasks with similar function vector representations also tend to follow similar trajectories in training. By using the space of representations derived from our task set, we can effectively predict the training trajectories of simple held-out compositional tasks throughout the course of pretraining ($R^2 = .68$-$.84$ across models) without previously evaluating them.