paper.dinq.meAI 与前沿科学顶会 · 学术新星雷达
登录 DINQ
返回新星榜
SZ

Siqi Zeng

COLM 2026ICML 2026效率与系统评测与基准安全强化学习与后训练数据与预训练
新星分新星
80
一作贡献70
核心/参与0
方向广度13
合作网络6
2 一作 · 2 篇 · COLM 2026 / ICML 2026

获取完整研究档案

首次获取该候选人的完整档案及 StartLux 评估共 20 积分;每位用户单独解锁,之后查看免费。主动刷新 20 积分。

联系方式

实时查找电子邮箱,费用不超过20积分;未找到邮箱不扣费。

2026 顶会论文

2
一作COLM 2026Poster· Poster Session 4· Franciscan C· #93

Steering Instruction Hierarchies at Inference Time

Siqi Zeng · Sewoong Lee · Han Zhao · Julia Hockenmaier

We study why LLMs fail at instruction hierarchies and show that simple inference-time steering can restore higher-priority instruction following that leads to better safety control efficiently.

摘要

Instruction hierarchies are a core safety assumption of language model deployment: higher priority inputs, such as system prompts, should override conflicting lower priority inputs from users or tools. Yet frontier LLMs often violate this hierarchy. We introduce V-Steer, a training-free inference time method that restores privileged influence by editing cached value vectors at prompt positions. Using direct logit attribution on the first next token prediction, V-Steer identifies heads where lower priority spans dominate privileged ones, then boosts privileged spans and suppresses conflicting lower priority spans through in-place multiplicative edits to cached $V$ tensors. Since the method acts only on cached values, it remains compatible with fused attention backends and adds only a one time prefill overhead. Across models from 7B to 70B, this attribution guided intervention raises primary constraint accuracy from under 18\% up to 92\% on controlled role conflict benchmarks, and on broader instruction hierarchy evaluations substantially outperforms prompt only baselines while matching or exceeding SoTA training based methods on 3 of 4 scales of LLMs, with negligible decoding-speed overhead.

效率与系统评测与基准安全instruction hierarchiessteeringrole conflictsAI safetyOpenReview 项目页

常见合作者