Mor Geva

While reasoning in LLMs plays a natural role in math, code generation, and multi-hop factual questions, its effect on simple, single-hop factual questions remains unclear. Such questions do not require step-by-step logical decomposition, making the utility of reasoning highly counterintuitive. Nevertheless, we find that enabling reasoning substantially expands the capability boundary of the model's parametric knowledge recall, unlocking correct answers that are otherwise effectively unreachable. Why does reasoning aid parametric knowledge recall when there are no complex reasoning steps to be done? To answer this, we design a series of hypothesis-driven controlled experiments, and identify two key driving mechanisms: (1) a computational buffer effect, where the model uses the generated reasoning tokens to perform latent computation independent of their semantic content; and (2) factual priming, where generating topically related facts acts as a semantic bridge that facilitates correct answer retrieval. Importantly, this latter generative self-retrieval mechanism carries inherent risks: we demonstrate that hallucinating intermediate facts during the reasoning process increases the likelihood of hallucinations in the final answer. Finally, we show that these insights can be harnessed to directly improve overall model accuracy by prioritizing reasoning trajectories that contain hallucination-free factual statements.

Large language models (LLMs) struggle with cross-lingual knowledge transfer: they sometimes hallucinate when asked in one language about facts expressed in a different language during training. This work introduces a controlled setting to study the causes and training dynamics of this phenomenon by training small Transformer models from scratch on synthetic multilingual datasets. Depending on (1) the correlation between the facts and the language they were learned in (informativeness), and (2) the ease of language identification (extractability), models either develop unified representations across languages or separate representations; only when the representations are unified do facts transfer across languages. Based on these insights, we propose a unifying perspective which explains a range of prior observations concerning cross-lingual transfer in multilingual LLMs. Our work shows how controlled settings can shed light on pre-training dynamics and suggests methods to encourage representational unification as part of training that would improve cross-lingual transfer in LLMs.

Interpreting the information encoded in model weights remains a fundamental challenge in mechanistic interpretability. In this work, we introduce ROTATE (Rotation-Optimized Token Alignment in weighT spacE), a data-free method requiring no forward passes that disentangles MLP neurons directly in weight space. Our approach relies on a key statistical observation: neurons that encode coherent, monosemantic concepts exhibit high kurtosis when projected onto the model's vocabulary. By optimizing rotations of neuron weights to maximize their vocabulary-space kurtosis, our method recovers sparse, interpretable directions which we name vocabulary channels. Experiments on Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct and Gemma-2-2B-it demonstrate that ROTATE consistently recovers vocabulary channels that are faithful to the neuron's behavior; ablating individual channels selectively disables corresponding input activations or the promotion of specific concepts. Moreover, aggregating channel-level descriptions yields comprehensive neuron descriptions that outperform optimized activation-based baselines by 2–3× in head-to-head comparisons. By providing a fine-grained, data-free decomposition of neuron weights, ROTATE offers a building block for scalable weight-space interpretability.