paper.dinq.meAI 与前沿科学顶会 · 学术新星雷达
登录 DINQ
返回新星榜
LR

Laura Ruis

COLM 2026×2推理可解释性安全评测与基准
新星分资深
13
一作贡献0
核心/参与5
方向广度8
合作网络0
0 一作 · 2 篇 · COLM 2026

获取完整研究档案

首次获取该候选人的完整档案及 StartLux 评估共 20 积分;每位用户单独解锁,之后查看免费。主动刷新 20 积分。

联系方式

实时查找电子邮箱,费用不超过20积分;未找到邮箱不扣费。

2026 顶会论文

2
作者位次 #3/3COLM 2026Poster· Poster Session 4· Franciscan C· #98

The Depth Ceiling: On the Limits of Large Language Models in Discovering Latent Planning

Yi Xu · Philipp Jettkant · Laura Ruis

We find that language models can only discover shallow latent planning strategies on their own, but can generalize to deeper reasoning once a shorter version is learned, suggesting a temporary safety margin for CoT monitoring.

摘要

Chain-of-thought (CoT) monitoring is most informative when models are \emph{unable} to reason effectively in their latent representations without externalizing that reasoning. Yet little is known about the limits of such latent reasoning in LLMs. We test these limits by studying whether models can discover multi-step planning strategies without supervision on intermediate steps and execute them latently, within a single forward pass. Using graph path-finding tasks that precisely control the number of required latent planning steps, we uncover a striking limitation unresolved by massive scaling: tiny transformers trained from scratch discover strategies requiring up to three latent steps, fine-tuned GPT-4o and Qwen3-32B reach five, and GPT-5.4 attains seven under few-shot prompting. Although the maximum latent planning depth models can learn during training is five, the discovered strategy generalizes up to eight latent steps at test-time. This reveals a dissociation between the ability to \emph{discover} a latent strategy under final-answer supervision alone and the ability to \emph{execute} it once discovered. If similar limits hold more broadly, strategies requiring multiple coordinated latent planning steps may need to be explicitly taught or externalized.

推理安全可解释性Implicit PlanningDiscovery CeilingAI SafetyOpenReview
作者位次 #3/4COLM 2026Poster· Poster Session 3· Imperial Ballroom· #34

Legibility is Not Interpretability: Evaluating Judged Importance versus Actual Importance in Chain-Of-Thought Reasoning Steps

Kevin Du · Alexander M Hoyle · Laura Ruis · Acyr Locatelli

推理评测与基准可解释性

常见合作者