paper.dinq.meAI 与前沿科学顶会 · 学术新星雷达
登录 DINQ
返回新星榜
RE

Roald Eiselen

COLM 2026SIGIR 2026多语言与语言学社会与人本强化学习与后训练检索与知识评测与基准
新星分资深
26
一作贡献0
核心/参与16
方向广度13
合作网络3
0 一作 · 2 篇 · COLM 2026 / SIGIR 2026

获取完整研究档案

首次获取该候选人的完整档案及 StartLux 评估共 20 积分;每位用户单独解锁,之后查看免费。主动刷新 20 积分。

联系方式

实时查找电子邮箱,费用不超过20积分;未找到邮箱不扣费。

2026 顶会论文

2
作者位次 #3/3COLM 2026Poster· Poster Session 6· Imperial Ballroom· #65

Human vs Machine Translation Detection: A Cross-Model, Cross-Domain, and Low-Resource Analysis

Yabsera Yemanberhan · Prasenjit Mitra · Roald Eiselen

A study of human vs machine translation detection across domains, models, and low-resource languages, combining fine-tuned and LLM methods with quality-aware evaluation to assess when machine translations become indistinguishable from human ones.

摘要

The growing reliance on web-crawled corpora for training large language models introduces a critical challenge: machine-translated (MT) content is often treated as human translation (HT), potentially degrading data quality and propagating synthetic artifacts, especially in low-resource settings. In this work, we study MT–HT detectability across high-resource (English, Spanish) and low-resource (Swahili, Afrikaans) languages using both decoder-only LLMs in zero-shot and few-shot settings, and fine-tuned multilingual encoders trained at the sentence level and on token-chunked inputs. We find that decoder-only models provide limited discrimination overall and exhibit a consistent class-asymmetric failure mode: they recognize human-written text reliably (high HT recall) but rarely flag fluent machine output (low MT recall). Encoder-based classifiers achieve high accuracy when evaluated on data generated by the same MT systems and translators used during training in a legislative domain, but their MT recall drops sharply on unseen translators and on unseen domains such as low-resource conversational text and medical content. To address this limitation, we evaluate models on longer inputs by chunking text into segments of up to 300 tokens, which substantially improves generalization, suggesting that sentence-level signals are insufficient for robust detection. Finally, we analyze the relationship between translation quality and detectability using COMET and BLEURT, showing that lower-quality MT is more easily identified, while high-quality MT remains difficult to distinguish from HT. Our results highlight the importance of input granularity, translator gener alization, and translation quality in building robust MT detection systems across domains and languages.

多语言与语言学社会与人本强化学习与后训练Machine translation detectionHuman vs machine translationLow-resource languagesCross-domain evaluationOpenReview
作者位次 #2/3SIGIR 2026Oral· Information Retrieval (Low-Resource)

From Translation to Retrieval: Evaluating LLM-Based Information Retrieval for Hausa and Fongbe

Mahounan Pericles Adjovi · Roald Eiselen · Prasenjit Mitra

摘要

LLM-based reranking has been evaluated for some African languages, but whether LLM-based query expansion helps or hurts retrieval for low-resource African languages remains an open question. Adeyemi et al. evaluated cross-lingual LLM reranking for Hausa with English queries, yet to our knowledge...

多语言与语言学检索与知识评测与基准OpenReview

常见合作者