paper.dinq.meAI 与前沿科学顶会 · 学术新星雷达
登录 DINQ
返回新星榜
ILIvan Yee Lee

Ivan Yee Lee

COLM 2026×2代码多模态可解释性推理检索与知识
新星分新星
73
一作贡献60
核心/参与0
方向广度10
合作网络3
2 一作 · 2 篇 · COLM 2026

获取完整研究档案

首次获取该候选人的完整档案及 StartLux 评估共 20 积分;每位用户单独解锁,之后查看免费。主动刷新 20 积分。

联系方式

实时查找电子邮箱,费用不超过20积分;未找到邮箱不扣费。

2026 顶会论文

2
一作COLM 2026Poster· Poster Session 4· Imperial Ballroom· #44

Optical Context Compression Is Just (Bad) Autoencoding

Ivan Yee Lee · Cheng Yang · Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick

Rendering text to pixels for compression destroys learned representations and gains nothing—simple direct baselines match or beat DeepSeek-OCR's vision encoder for reconstruction, language modeling, and factual recall.

摘要

DeepSeek-OCR shows that rendered text can be reconstructed from a small number of vision tokens, sparking excitement about using vision as a compression medium for long textual contexts. But this pipeline requires rendering token embeddings to pixels and compressing from there—discarding learned representations in favor of an image the vision encoder must then recover from. We ask whether this detour helps. Comparing DeepSeek-OCR's vision encoder against near-zero-parameter mean pooling and a learned hierarchical encoder, we find it does not. For reconstruction, simple direct methods match or surpass vision at every compression ratio. For language modeling, vision performs comparably to truncation—a baseline that simply discards context—and loses to the hierarchical encoder at every compression ratio. As expected, all compression methods outperform truncation for factual recall, but vision never surpasses the best direct baseline. The excitement around optical context compression outpaces the evidence. Code and checkpoints are available at https://github.com/ivnle/bad-autoencoding.

多模态代码可解释性context compressionvision-language modelsautoencodingtoken compressionOpenReview
一作COLM 2026Poster· Poster Session 6· Franciscan A· #79

The Format Tax: Separating the Cost of Requesting Structure from the Cost of Enforcing It

Ivan Yee Lee · Loris D'Antoni · Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick

Requiring structured output (JSON, XML, etc.) degrades LLM reasoning and writing. The cause is prompt-induced distribution shift, not decoder bias. Letting models reason freely then reformat recovers most lost accuracy.

摘要

Asking a large language model to respond in JSON should be a formatting choice, not a capability tax. Yet we find that structured output requirements—JSON, XML, LaTeX, Markdown—substantially degrade reasoning and writing performance across open-weight models. The research response has focused on constrained decoding, but sampling bias accounts for only a fraction of the degradation. The dominant cost enters at the prompt: format-requesting instructions alone cause most of the accuracy loss, before any decoder constraint is applied. This diagnosis points to a simple principle: decouple reasoning from formatting. Across six open-weight models, four API models, four formats, and tasks spanning math, science, logic, and writing, generating freeform first and reformatting in a second pass recovers most lost accuracy; enabling extended thinking within a single generation recovers more on reasoning tasks but can cost writing quality. Notably, most recent closed-weight models show little to no format tax, suggesting the problem is not inherent to structured generation but a gap that current open-weight models have yet to close. Code is available at https://github.com/ivnle/the-format-tax.

推理代码检索与知识structured generationgrammar-constrained decodingstructured output degradationreasoningOpenReview

常见合作者