Wenxuan Zhang

Multi-agent role-playing has recently shown promise for studying social behavior with language agents, but existing simulations are mostly monolingual without cross-lingual interaction, an essential property of real societies. We introduce MAWM, the first Multilingual Agent-based World Modeling framework that supports multi-turn multilingual interactions among generative agents with diverse sociolinguistic profiles. MAWM enables two modes of analysis: (i) global public opinion modeling, which tracks how attitudes toward open-domain survey questions evolve across languages and cultures, and (ii) media influence and information diffusion, via autonomous news agents that dynamically generate content and shape user behavior. To ground the simulation in realistic population distributions, we construct the MAPS benchmark, which combines survey questions and demographic personas drawn from global population distributions. Experiments on simulation alignment, along with social science case studies on cultural assimilation and normative diffusion, show that native-language simulation better reflects real survey data than English-only simulation, and that the agent society in MAWM reproduces established sociocultural phenomena and highlights the value of multilingual simulation as an alternative interpretable tool for computational social science.

Large-scale communities of AI agents are becoming increasingly prevalent, creating new environments for agent–agent social interaction. Prior work has examined multi-agent behavior primarily in controlled or small-scale settings, limiting our understanding of emergent social dynamics at scale. The recent emergence of MoltBook, a social networking platform designed explicitly for AI agents, presents a unique opportunity to study whether and how these interactions reproduce core human social mechanisms. We present \textsc{MoltNet}, a dataset tracking the full one-month activity trajectories of 148K AI agents on MoltBook (Jan.--Feb., 2026), and analyze their social interaction along four theory-grounded dimensions: \textit{intent and motivation}, \textit{norms and templates}, \textit{incentives and drift}, and \textit{emotion and contagion}. Our analysis reveals that agents respond strongly to social rewards, converge on community-specific norms, and actively enforce them across community boundaries --- resembling human incentive sensitivity and normative conformity. However, they exhibit weak alignment with declared personas and display limited emotional reciprocity and dialogic engagement, diverging systematically from human online communities. These findings establish a first empirical portrait of agent social behavior at scale, with direct implications for the design and governance of AI-populated communities.