paper.dinq.meAI 与前沿科学顶会 · 学术新星雷达
登录 DINQ
返回新星榜
HK

Hyunwoo Kim

COLM 2026×2评测与基准对齐与偏好强化学习与后训练社会与人本推理
新星分贡献者
34
一作贡献0
核心/参与10
方向广度10
合作网络3
0 一作 · 2 篇 · COLM 2026

获取完整研究档案

首次获取该候选人的完整档案及 StartLux 评估共 20 积分;每位用户单独解锁,之后查看免费。主动刷新 20 积分。

联系方式

实时查找电子邮箱,费用不超过20积分;未找到邮箱不扣费。

2026 顶会论文

2
作者位次 #4/5COLM 2026Poster· Poster Session 4· Imperial Ballroom· #57

GoodPoint: Learning Constructive Scientific Paper Feedback from Author Responses

Jimin Mun · Chani Jung · Xuhui Zhou · Hyunwoo Kim · Maarten Sap

We introduce GoodPoint, a training recipe, dataset, and evaluation for author-focused effective feedback generation for scientific papers.

摘要

While LLMs hold significant potential to transform scientific research, we advocate for their use to augment and empower researchers rather than to automate research without human oversight. To this end, we study _constructive feedback generation_, the task of producing targeted, actionable feedback that helps authors improve both their research and its presentation. In this work, we operationalize the effectiveness of feedback along two author-centric axes—_validity_ and _author action_. We first curate GoodPoint-ICLR, a dataset of 19K ICLR papers with reviewer feedback annotated along both dimensions using author responses. Building on this, we introduce GoodPoint, a training recipe that leverages success signals from author responses through fine-tuning on valid and actionable feedback, together with preference optimization on both real and synthetic preference pairs. Our evaluation on a benchmark of 1.2K ICLR papers shows that a GoodPoint-trained Qwen3-8B improves the predicted success rate by 83.7% over the base model and sets a new state-of-the-art among LLMs of similar size in feedback matching on a golden human feedback set, even surpassing Gemini-3-flash in precision. We further validate these findings through an expert human study, demonstrating that GoodPoint consistently delivers higher practical value as perceived by authors.

评测与基准对齐与偏好强化学习与后训练LLM ApplicationLLM for writing assistanceLLM for scienceOpenReview
作者位次 #4/5COLM 2026Poster· Poster Session 4· Imperial Ballroom· #7

Social World Models

Xuhui Zhou · Jiarui Liu · Akhila Yerukola · Hyunwoo Kim · Maarten Sap

Introduce Social world models (SWMs) to help AI simulate the "unspoken" dynamics of human interaction, like intentions, beliefs, and evolving social states, to better help social reasoning.

摘要

Humans intuitively navigate social interactions by simulating unspoken dynamics and reasoning about others’ perspectives, even with limited information. In contrast, AI systems struggle to structure and reason about implicit social contexts, as they lack explicit representations for unobserved dynamics such as intentions, beliefs, and evolving social states. In this paper, we introduce the concept of social world models (SWMs) to characterize the complex social dynamics. To operationalize SWMs, we introduce a novel structured social world representation formalism (S3AP), which captures the evolving states, actions, and mental states of agents, addressing the lack of explicit structure in traditional free-text-based inputs. Through comprehensive experiments across five social reasoning benchmarks, we show that S3AP significantly enhances LLM performance—achieving a +51% improvement on FANToM over OpenAI’s o1. Our ablations further reveal that these gains are driven by the explicit modeling of hidden mental states, which proves more effective than a wide range of baseline methods. Finally, we introduce an algorithm for social world models using S3AP, which enables AI agents to build models of their interlocutors and predict their next actions and mental states. Empirically, S3AP-enabled social world models yield up to +18% improvement on the SOTOPIA multi-turn social interaction benchmark. Our findings highlight the promise of S3AP as a powerful, general-purpose representation for social world states, enabling the development of more socially-aware systems that better navigate social interactions.

社会与人本推理智能体与工具social intelligence; theory of mindOpenReview

常见合作者