paper.dinq.meAI 与前沿科学顶会 · 学术新星雷达
登录 DINQ
返回新星榜
DA

Darsh Agrawal

ACL 2026×2COLM 2026评测与基准推理代码可解释性多语言与语言学
新星分贡献者
55
一作贡献0
核心/参与22
方向广度13
合作网络9
0 一作 · 3 篇 · ACL 2026 / COLM 2026

获取完整研究档案

首次获取该候选人的完整档案及 StartLux 评估共 20 积分;每位用户单独解锁,之后查看免费。主动刷新 20 积分。

联系方式

实时查找电子邮箱,费用不超过20积分;未找到邮箱不扣费。

2026 顶会论文

3
作者位次 #4/7COLM 2026Poster· Poster Session 5· Franciscan B· #88

MetaLint: Easy-to-Hard Generalization for Code Linting

Atharva Naik · Lawanya Baghel · Dhatchinamoorthi Kunde Govindarajan · Darsh Agrawal · Yiqing Xie · Daniel Fried · Carolyn Rose

Easy to Hard Generalization for LLM Code Linting using Synthetic Data and Instruction Following

摘要

Large language models excel at code generation but struggle with code linting, particularly in generalizing to unseen or evolving best practices beyond those observed during training. We introduce MetaLint, a meta-learning framework that formulates code linting as an instruction-following task, where a model evaluates whether code adheres to a natural language specification of best practices. In contrast to prior work that trains models to detect violations from a fixed set of best practices, MetaLint evaluates code against a provided natural language specification, enabling test-time control over which practices to enforce and generalization to unseen or evolving rules without retraining. We demonstrate that models trained solely on synthetic data generated from automatic linters still generalize to harder, context-dependent best practices for which such linters are not available. To evaluate generalization beyond such easy signals, we introduce a human-curated benchmark of hard best practices inspired by Python Enhancement Proposals (PEPs). On this benchmark, MetaLint substantially improves performance without explicit fine-tuning on target best practices and exhibits strong easy-to-hard generalization. Qwen3-4B achieves a 2.7x detection F-score gain (25.9% → 70.4%), the highest recall, and a 26.7% localization F-score, matching larger models such as o3-mini. These gains generalize across programming languages, model families, scales, reasoning settings, and linter sources. We release the code and benchmark to support reproducibility and future work.

评测与基准代码推理transfer learningeasy to hard generalizationlintingcode quality analysisOpenReview
作者位次 #11/16ACL 2026Poster· Natural Language Processing

PR i SM : Benchmarking Phone Realization in Speech Models

Shikhar Bharadwaj · Chin-Jou Li · Yoonjae Kim · Kwanghee Choi · Eunjung Yeo · Ryan Soh-Eun Shim · Hanyu Zhou · Brendon Boldt · Karen Rosero · Kalvin Chang · Darsh Agrawal · Keer Xu · Chao-Han Huck Yang · Jian Zhu · Shinji Watanabe · David R. Mortensen

摘要

Phone recognition (PR) serves as the atomic interface for language-agnostic modeling for cross-lingual speech processing and phonetic analysis. Despite prolonged efforts in developing PR systems, current evaluations only measure surface-level transcription accuracy. We introduce PRiSM, the first...

评测与基准可解释性多语言与语言学OpenReview 项目页
作者位次 #2/9ACL 2026Findings· Findings of ACL

PBEB ench: A Multi-Step Programming by Examples Reasoning Benchmark inspired by Historical Linguistics

Atharva Naik · Darsh Agrawal · Prakam · Yash Mathur · Manav Kapadnis · Yuwei An · Clayton Marr · Carolyn Rose · David R. Mortensen

摘要

While many benchmarks evaluate the reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), few isolate reasoning as a capability independent of domain knowledge. We introduce a new benchmark for inductive reasoning inspired by Sound Law Induction (SLI) in historical linguistics and formulated in a s...

推理评测与基准检索与知识OpenReview 项目页

常见合作者