paper.dinq.meAI 与前沿科学顶会 · 学术新星雷达
登录 DINQ
返回新星榜
YY

Yuqing Yang

ICLR 2026×2COLM 2026CVPR 2026推理强化学习与后训练智能体与工具安全检索与知识
新星分资深
25
一作贡献0
核心/参与5
方向广度16
合作网络9
0 一作 · 4 篇 · ICLR 2026 / COLM 2026 / CVPR 2026

获取完整研究档案

首次获取该候选人的完整档案及 StartLux 评估共 20 积分;每位用户单独解锁,之后查看免费。主动刷新 20 积分。

联系方式

实时查找电子邮箱,费用不超过20积分;未找到邮箱不扣费。

2026 顶会论文

4
作者位次 #8/8COLM 2026Poster· Poster Session 3· Imperial Ballroom· #35

Why Does Self-Distillation (Sometimes) Degrade the Reasoning Capability of LLMs?

Jeonghye Kim · Xufang Luo · Minbeom Kim · Sangmook Lee · Dohyung Kim · Jiwon Jeon · Dongsheng Li · Yuqing Yang

Self-distillation can degrade LLM reasoning by suppressing uncertainty expressions via rich teacher conditioning. Two factors govern this: context richness (richer → more suppression) and task coverage (broader → more harmful).

摘要

Self-distillation has emerged as an effective post-training paradigm for LLMs, often improving performance while shortening reasoning traces. However, in mathematical reasoning, we find that it can reduce response length while degrading performance. We trace this degradation to the suppression of epistemic verbalization—the model's expression of uncertainty during reasoning. Through controlled experiments varying conditioning context richness and task coverage, we show that conditioning the teacher on rich information suppresses uncertainty expression, enabling rapid in-domain optimization with limited task coverage but harming OOD performance, where unseen problems benefit from expressing uncertainty and adjusting accordingly. Across Qwen3-1.7B/8B, DeepSeek-Distill-Qwen-7B, and Olmo3-7B-Instruct, we observe performance drops of up to 40%. Our findings highlight that exposing appropriate levels of uncertainty is crucial for robust reasoning and underscore the importance of optimizing reasoning behavior beyond merely reinforcing correct answer traces.

推理强化学习与后训练安全Self-distillationChain-of-thoughtUncertainty in reasoningOpenReview

常见合作者