paper.dinq.meAI 与前沿科学顶会 · 学术新星雷达
登录 DINQ
返回新星榜
JL

Jae-Gil Lee

CVPR 2026×2COLM 2026ICLR 2026检索与知识评测与基准智能体与工具多模态数据与预训练
新星分贡献者
49
一作贡献0
核心/参与15
方向广度16
合作网络6
0 一作 · 4 篇 · CVPR 2026 / COLM 2026 / ICLR 2026

获取完整研究档案

首次获取该候选人的完整档案及 StartLux 评估共 20 积分;每位用户单独解锁,之后查看免费。主动刷新 20 积分。

联系方式

实时查找电子邮箱,费用不超过20积分;未找到邮箱不扣费。

2026 顶会论文

4
作者位次 #5/6COLM 2026Poster· Poster Session 2· Imperial Ballroom· #58

Towards Query-Agnostic RAG Evaluation via Query Coverage and Claim Verifiability

Jeonghwan Choi · Taewon Yun · Minjeong Ban · Gyeonghun Sun · Jae-Gil Lee · Hwanjun Song

We redefine correctness of RAG response as the joint satisfaction of query coverage and claim verifiability, enabling fine-grained, reference-free evaluation that works consistently across both close- and open-ended queries.

摘要

Retrieval augmented generation improves the factuality of large language models by grounding responses in retrieved evidence, yet existing evaluation frameworks struggle to provide consistent, fine-grained diagnostics across the diverse spectrum of user queries, ranging from close-ended fact-seeking to open-ended explanatory requests. We propose Q-CARE, a query-agnostic and fully reference-free framework that enables fine-grained assessment by decomposing queries into sub-queries and answers into atomic claims. Q-CARE establishes a unified evaluation principle based on query coverage and claim verifiability, yielding coverage-aware retriever metrics (C-Prec@k, C-nDCG@k) and claim-level generator metrics (Completeness, Conciseness, and Verifiableness). On a human-annotated benchmark spanning eight datasets, Q-CARE achieves higher correlation with human judgments than four existing RAG evaluation metrics, including RAGEval and RAGChecker, proving its effectiveness as a reliable, automated evaluation framework. Code and data are publicly available at \url{https://github.com/DISL-Lab/Q-CaRE-COLM-26}.

检索与知识评测与基准数据与预训练RAGMetricsRAG EvaluationReference-freeOpenReview

常见合作者