paper.dinq.meAI 与前沿科学顶会 · 学术新星雷达
登录 DINQ
返回新星榜
XH

Xiangkun Hu

COLM 2026×2ICLR 2026智能体与工具检索与知识评测与基准长上下文与架构多模态
新星分贡献者
43
一作贡献0
核心/参与15
方向广度13
合作网络3
0 一作 · 3 篇 · COLM 2026 / ICLR 2026

获取完整研究档案

首次获取该候选人的完整档案及 StartLux 评估共 20 积分;每位用户单独解锁,之后查看免费。主动刷新 20 积分。

联系方式

实时查找电子邮箱,费用不超过20积分;未找到邮箱不扣费。

2026 顶会论文

3
作者位次 #5/7COLM 2026Poster· Poster Session 5· Imperial Ballroom· #56

Neural Architecture Discovery via Autonomous Evolution

Weixian Xu · Yixiu Liu · Yang Nan · Lyumanshan Ye · Xiangkun Hu · Zhen Qin · Pengfei Liu

We present ASI-Arch to study whether AI can autonomously tackle long-horizon research problems in AI itself, and show that it discovers 105 SOTA linear attention architectures, with the best achieving nearly 3x the gain of Mamba2 over DeltaNet.

摘要

Recent progress in LLM agents has advanced the prospect of autonomous research. Yet whether AI can complete difficult long-horizon tasks, especially those that advance AI research itself, remains largely unexplored. We present ASI-Arch, a system for **AI-driven AI research** that autonomously conducts neural architecture research through a closed-loop *research-experiment-analyze-update* process. Applied to linear attention, ASI-Arch ran 1,773 iterative experiments and discovered 105 state-of-the-art architectures. Its best architecture improves over DeltaNet by nearly three times the gain achieved by Mamba2. Beyond the final performance gains, we analyze the contributions of different parts of the framework in this hard research setting, shedding light on what enables autonomous progress in complex AI research tasks.

长上下文与架构智能体与工具检索与知识Autonomous ResearchLinear AttentionLLM AgentsNeural ArchitecturesOpenReview
作者位次 #4/5COLM 2026Poster· Poster Session 4· Grand Ballroom· #119

ResearcherBench: Evaluating Deep AI Research Systems on Open-ended AI Research Tasks

Tianze Xu · Pengrui Lu · Lyumanshan Ye · Xiangkun Hu · Pengfei Liu

This paper introduces ResearcherBench, the first benchmark designed to evaluate if Deep AI Research systems can provide meaningful insights for genuinely unsolved, open-ended AI research tasks.

摘要

Deep research agents have emerged with capabilities extending from basic queries to sophisticated research tasks. However, existing benchmarks primarily evaluate their abilities on web retrieval and report generation, overlooking the potential for discovering, integrating and generating insights in AI research. To address this gap, we introduce ResearcherBench, the first benchmark focused on evaluating the capabilities of Deep AI Research Systems (DARS) on open-ended AI research tasks. We curated a dataset of 65 questions expertly selected from real-world AI research scenarios, spanning 35 different AI subjects and categorized into 3 different types. Our dual evaluation framework consists of two components: insight assessment which implements expert-designed rubrics to evaluate insight quality, and citation assessment measuring citation faithfulness and groundedness (citation density). We evaluated several leading commercial DARS and baseline systems. Our evaluation results reveal that these systems excel at open-ended consulting questions compared to technical implementation questions, demonstrating the potential for DARS to serve as AI research partners. We open-source ResearcherBench and evaluation framework to accelerate the development of AI research assistants capable of scientific collaboration.

评测与基准检索与知识智能体与工具AI EvaluationDeep ResearchBenchmarkAI ResearchOpenReview

常见合作者