paper.dinq.meAI 与前沿科学顶会 · 学术新星雷达
登录 DINQ
返回新星榜
AA

Aryaman Arora

COLM 2026×2ICML 2026可解释性社会与人本对齐与偏好安全检索与知识
新星分新星
84
一作贡献75
核心/参与5
方向广度13
合作网络9
2 一作 · 3 篇 · COLM 2026 / ICML 2026

获取完整研究档案

首次获取该候选人的完整档案及 StartLux 评估共 20 积分;每位用户单独解锁,之后查看免费。主动刷新 20 积分。

联系方式

实时查找电子邮箱,费用不超过20积分;未找到邮箱不扣费。

2026 顶会论文

3
作者位次 #6/10COLM 2026Poster· Poster Session 5· Franciscan B· #83

Verbalizing LLMs' assumptions to explain and control sycophancy

Myra Cheng · Isabel Sieh · Humishka Zope · Sunny Yu · Lujain Ibrahim · Aryaman Arora · Jared Moore · Desmond Ong · Dan Jurafsky · Diyi Yang

We provide evidence of causal links between models' internal assumptions and downstream sycophancy, and surface these assumptions using Verbalized Assumptions; we show that assumption probes can steer LLM sycophancy.

摘要

LLMs can be socially sycophantic, affirming users when they ask questions like "am I in the wrong?" rather than providing genuine assessment. We hypothesize that this behavior arises from LLMs' incorrect assumptions about the user, like underestimating how often users are seeking information over reassurance. We present Verbalized Assumptions, a framework for eliciting these assumptions from LLMs. Verbalized Assumptions provide insight into LLM sycophancy, delusion, and other safety issues: in social sycophancy datasets, "seeking validation" is the most frequent bigram in LLMs' assumptions. We provide evidence for a causal link between assumptions and sycophantic model behavior: we train linear probes on internal representations associated with Verbalized Assumptions and then use these probes for interpretable, fine-grained steering of social sycophancy. Finally, we identify a *human-AI expectation gap* that explains why LLMs default to sycophantic assumptions. On identical queries, people expect more objective and informative responses from AI than from other humans, but LLMs trained on human-human conversation do not account for this difference in expectations. Our work contributes a new understanding of assumptions as a mechanism for analyzing and controlling sycophancy.

可解释性社会与人本对齐与偏好verbalized assumptionssteeringprobesuser modelsOpenReview
一作COLM 2026Poster· Poster Session 2· Imperial Ballroom· #12

ADAG: Automatically Describing Attribution Graphs

Aryaman Arora · Zhengxuan Wu · Jacob Steinhardt · Sarah Schwettmann

We introduce an end-to-end system for interpreting language model circuits for arbitrary behaviours.

摘要

In language model interpretability research, **circuit tracing** aims to identify which internal features causally contributed to a particular output and how they affected each other, with the goal of explaining the computations underlying some behaviour. However, all prior circuit tracing work has relied on ad-hoc human interpretation of the role that each feature in the circuit plays, via manual inspection of data artifacts such as the dataset examples the component activates on. We introduce **ADAG**, an end-to-end pipeline for describing these attribution graphs which is fully automated. To achieve this, we introduce *attribution profiles* which quantify the functional role of a feature via its input and output gradient effects. We then introduce a novel clustering algorithm for grouping features, and an LLM explainer--simulator setup which generates and scores natural-language explanations of the functional role of these feature groups. We run our system on known human-analysed circuit-tracing tasks and recover interpretable circuits, and further show ADAG can find steerable clusters which are responsible for a harmful advice jailbreak in Llama 3.1 8B Instruct.

可解释性安全检索与知识mechanistic interpretabilityautomated interpretabilitycircuit tracingOpenReview

常见合作者