paper.dinq.meAI 与前沿科学顶会 · 学术新星雷达
登录 DINQ
返回新星榜
WA

Wasi Uddin Ahmad

COLM 2026×2强化学习与后训练智能体与工具数据与预训练评测与基准对齐与偏好
新星分贡献者
48
一作贡献0
核心/参与17
方向广度10
合作网络9
0 一作 · 2 篇 · COLM 2026

获取完整研究档案

首次获取该候选人的完整档案及 StartLux 评估共 20 积分;每位用户单独解锁,之后查看免费。主动刷新 20 积分。

联系方式

实时查找电子邮箱,费用不超过20积分;未找到邮箱不扣费。

2026 顶会论文

2
作者位次 #2/4COLM 2026Poster· Poster Session 2· Franciscan A· #79

From SWE-ZERO to SWE-HERO: Execution-free to Execution-based Fine-tuning for Software Engineering Agents

Nikolai Ludwig · Wasi Uddin Ahmad · Somshubra Majumdar · Boris Ginsburg

The paper presents a two-stage SFT recipe that achieves SOTA results by distilling frontier model trajectories into smaller open-source LLMs.

摘要

To address the complexities of automated software issue resolution, we present SWE-Zero to SWE-Hero, a high-performance SFT recipe that achieves state-of-the-art resolution rates on SWE-bench. Traditional methods often depend on verifiable execution environments, which are labor-intensive and technically complex to scale. In contrast, our approach pushes the boundaries of SFT by distilling open-weight frontier LLMs through a streamlined two-stage pipeline: (1) SWE-Zero, which leverages execution-free fine-tuning at scale, and (2) SWE-Hero, which utilizes lightweight, execution-based SFT to refine agent performance. Our empirical results establish a new state-of-the-art among open-source models of comparable size on SWE-bench Verified. We release a comprehensive dataset of 300k \emph{zero} and 13k \emph{hero} agent trajectories distilled from Qwen3-Coder-480B, alongside a suite of agents fine-tuned from the Qwen2.5-Coder series. Notably, SWE-Zero-32B achieves a 62.2\% resolution rate. We further validate the paradigm’s generalizability on SWE-bench Multilingual, where SWE-Hero-32B reaches 44.1\%. This strong zero-shot performance across languages, achieved despite Python-only training, underscores the robustness of our distillation recipe.

强化学习与后训练智能体与工具数据与预训练SWE-agentDistillationOpenReview
作者位次 #34/40COLM 2026Poster· Poster Session 3· Grand Ballroom· #122

BigCodeArena: A Platform for Executable Code Generation Evaluation

Terry Yue Zhuo · Xiaolong Jin · Hange Liu · Juyong Jiang · Tianyang Liu · Chen GONG · Bhupesh Bishnoi · Vaisakhi Mishra · Marek Suppa · Noah Ziems · Saiteja Utpala · Ming Xu · Guangyu Song · Kaixin Li · Yuhan Cao · Bo Liu · Zheng Liu · Sabina Abdurakhmanova · Wenhao Yu · Mengzhao Jia · Jihan Yao · Kenneth Hamilton · Kumar Shridhar · Vu Minh Chien · Dingmin Wang · Jiawei Liu · Zijian Wang · Qian Liu · Binyuan Hui · Meg Risdal · Ahsen Khaliq · Atin Sood · Zhenchang Xing · Wasi Uddin Ahmad · John C. Grundy · David Lo · Banghua Zhu · Xiaoning Du · Torsten Scholak · Leandro von Werra

We built a platform for executable code generation evaluation and analyzed the 14K collected data.

摘要

Crowdsourced evaluation platforms such as Chatbot Arena enable real-time human assessment of model responses, but evaluating LLM-generated code remains challenging due to long outputs and the need to reason about execution behavior. We introduce BigCodeArena, an open human evaluation platform for code generation with an on-the-fly execution backend. BigCodeArena executes LLM-generated code and allows humans to interact directly with execution processes and outcomes. We collect over 14K code-centric conversations across 10 widely used LLMs, spanning 10 programming languages and 8 execution environments, including more than 4.7K multi-turn samples with pairwise human preferences. Our analysis reveals fine-grained preferences across tasks, languages, and frameworks. With the collected data, we construct two benchmarks: BigCodeReward, which measures alignment between reward models and human preferences, and AutoCodeArena, an automated Elo-style benchmark for code generation. Results show that execution feedback improves preference modeling, and that proprietary models such as GPT-5 and Claude-4 variants remain strong performers.

评测与基准对齐与偏好代码code generationlarge language modelshuman preferencellm-as-a-judgeOpenReview

常见合作者