paper.dinq.meAI 与前沿科学顶会 · 学术新星雷达
登录 DINQ
返回新星榜
HL

Hange Liu

COLM 2026ICLR 2026评测与基准对齐与偏好代码智能体与工具
新星分贡献者
45
一作贡献0
核心/参与10
方向广度11
合作网络12
0 一作 · 2 篇 · COLM 2026 / ICLR 2026

获取完整研究档案

首次获取该候选人的完整档案及 StartLux 评估共 20 积分;每位用户单独解锁,之后查看免费。主动刷新 20 积分。

联系方式

实时查找电子邮箱,费用不超过20积分;未找到邮箱不扣费。

2026 顶会论文

2
作者位次 #3/40COLM 2026Poster· Poster Session 3· Grand Ballroom· #122

BigCodeArena: A Platform for Executable Code Generation Evaluation

Terry Yue Zhuo · Xiaolong Jin · Hange Liu · Juyong Jiang · Tianyang Liu · Chen GONG · Bhupesh Bishnoi · Vaisakhi Mishra · Marek Suppa · Noah Ziems · Saiteja Utpala · Ming Xu · Guangyu Song · Kaixin Li · Yuhan Cao · Bo Liu · Zheng Liu · Sabina Abdurakhmanova · Wenhao Yu · Mengzhao Jia · Jihan Yao · Kenneth Hamilton · Kumar Shridhar · Vu Minh Chien · Dingmin Wang · Jiawei Liu · Zijian Wang · Qian Liu · Binyuan Hui · Meg Risdal · Ahsen Khaliq · Atin Sood · Zhenchang Xing · Wasi Uddin Ahmad · John C. Grundy · David Lo · Banghua Zhu · Xiaoning Du · Torsten Scholak · Leandro von Werra

We built a platform for executable code generation evaluation and analyzed the 14K collected data.

摘要

Crowdsourced evaluation platforms such as Chatbot Arena enable real-time human assessment of model responses, but evaluating LLM-generated code remains challenging due to long outputs and the need to reason about execution behavior. We introduce BigCodeArena, an open human evaluation platform for code generation with an on-the-fly execution backend. BigCodeArena executes LLM-generated code and allows humans to interact directly with execution processes and outcomes. We collect over 14K code-centric conversations across 10 widely used LLMs, spanning 10 programming languages and 8 execution environments, including more than 4.7K multi-turn samples with pairwise human preferences. Our analysis reveals fine-grained preferences across tasks, languages, and frameworks. With the collected data, we construct two benchmarks: BigCodeReward, which measures alignment between reward models and human preferences, and AutoCodeArena, an automated Elo-style benchmark for code generation. Results show that execution feedback improves preference modeling, and that proprietary models such as GPT-5 and Claude-4 variants remain strong performers.

评测与基准对齐与偏好代码code generationlarge language modelshuman preferencellm-as-a-judgeOpenReview
作者位次 #55/84ICLR 2026Poster

Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfaces

Mike Merrill · Alexander Shaw · Nicholas Carlini · Boxuan Li · Harsh Raj · Ivan Bercovich · Lin Shi · Jeong Shin · Thomas Walshe · E. Kelly Buchanan · Junhong Shen · Guanghao Ye · Haowei Lin · Jason Poulos · Maoyu Wang · Marianna Nezhurina · Di Lu · Orfeas Menis Mastromichalakis · Zhiwei Xu · Zizhao Chen · Yue Liu · Robert Zhang · Leon Liangyu Chen · Anurag Kashyap · Jan-Lucas Uslu · Jeffrey Li · Jianbo Wu · Minghao Yan · Song Bian · Vedang Sharma · Ke Sun · Steven Dillmann · Akshay Anand · Andrew Lanpouthakoun · Bardia Koopah · Changran Hu · Etash Guha · Gabriel Dreiman · Jiacheng Zhu · Karl Krauth · Li Zhong · Niklas Muennighoff · Robert Amanfu · Shangyin Tan · Shreyas Pimpalgaonkar · Tushar Aggarwal · Xiangning Lin · Xin Lan · Xuandong Zhao · Yiqing Liang · Yuanli Wang · Zilong (Ryan) Wang · Changzhi Zhou · David Heineman · Hange Liu · Harsh Trivedi · John Yang · Junhong Lin · Manish Shetty · Michael Yang · Nabil Omi · Negin Raoof · Shanda Li · Terry Yue Zhuo · Wuwei Lin · Yiwei Dai · Yuxin Wang · Wenhao Chai · Shang Zhou · Dariush Wahdany · Ziyu She · Jiaming Hu · Zhikang Dong · Yuxuan Zhu · Sasha Cui · Ahson Saiyed · Arinbjörn Kolbeinsson · Christopher Rytting · Ryan Marten · Yixin Wang · Jenia Jitsev · Alex Dimakis · Andy Konwinski · Ludwig Schmidt

智能体与工具评测与基准OpenReview

常见合作者