Zheng Xu

Differentially private (DP) fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs) requires massive compute and full model access, which rules out state-of-the-art proprietary APIs for general users. Generating DP synthetic data offers a practical workaround. This approach also allows for transparent exploratory data analysis and arbitrary reuse across downstream tasks, sidestepping the rigid constraints of a model's parameter space. Private Evolution (PE) provides a promising API-based framework for generating this data, but its success relies heavily on initialization. If the private data distribution falls too far outside the foundation model's pre-training priors -- a common issue in highly specialized domain -- PE struggles to align with the target data. This misalignment causes poor convergence, degraded utility, and wasted API calls. To solve this initialization bottleneck, we introduce Metadata Augmented Private Language Evolution (MAPLE). MAPLE extracts DP tabular metadata and uses in-context learning to firmly ground the initial synthetic distribution in the target domain. Our evaluations on domain-specific text generation tasks show that MAPLE yields a strictly better privacy-utility trade-off, converges significantly faster, and sharply reduces API costs compared to baseline PE methods.

Knowledge Distillation (KD) is increasingly adopted to transfer capabilities from large language models to smaller ones, offering significant improvements in efficiency and utility while often surpassing standard fine-tuning. Beyond performance, KD is also explored as a privacy-preserving mechanism to mitigate the risk of training data leakage. While training data memorization has been extensively studied in standard pre-training and fine-tuning settings, its dynamics in a knowledge distillation setup remain poorly understood. In this work, we study memorization across the KD pipeline using three large language model (LLM) families (Pythia, OLMo-2, Qwen-3) and three datasets (FineWeb, Wikitext, Nemotron-CC-v2). We find: (1) distilled models memorize significantly less training data than standard fine-tuning (reducing memorization by more than 50%); (2) some examples are inherently easier to memorize and account for a large fraction of memorization during distillation (over ~95%); (3) student memorization is predictable prior to distillation using features based on zlib entropy, KL divergence, and perplexity; and (4) while soft and hard distillation have similar overall memorization rates, hard distillation poses a greater risk: it inherits 2.7 times more teacher-specific examples than soft distillation. Overall, we demonstrate that distillation can provide both improved generalization and reduced memorization risks compared to standard fine-tuning.