paper.dinq.meAI 与前沿科学顶会 · 学术新星雷达
登录 DINQ
返回新星榜
HF

Haoyang Fang

COLM 2026KDD 2026效率与系统评测与基准数据与预训练检索与知识
新星分新星
66
一作贡献30
核心/参与9
方向广度11
合作网络9
1 一作 · 2 篇 · COLM 2026 / KDD 2026

获取完整研究档案

首次获取该候选人的完整档案及 StartLux 评估共 20 积分;每位用户单独解锁,之后查看免费。主动刷新 20 积分。

联系方式

实时查找电子邮箱,费用不超过20积分;未找到邮箱不扣费。

2026 顶会论文

2
一作COLM 2026Poster· Poster Session 6· Imperial Ballroom· #13

OPERA: Online Data Pruning for Efficient Retrieval Model Adaptation

Haoyang Fang · Shuai Zhang · Yifei Ma · Hengyi Wang · Cuixiong Hu · Katrin Kirchhoff · Bernie Wang · George Karypis

OPERA improves dense retriever finetuning by dynamically modulating query- and document-level sampling probabilities, resolving the quality-coverage tradeoff between ranking and retrieval metrics.

摘要

Domain-specific finetuning is essential for dense retrievers, yet not all data pairs contribute equally to the learning process. We introduce OPERA, a data pruning framework that exploits this heterogeneity to improve both the effectiveness and efficiency of retrieval model adaptation. We first investigate static pruning (SP), which retains only high-similarity query-document pairs, revealing an intrinsic quality-coverage tradeoff: ranking (NDCG) improves while retrieval (Recall) can degrade due to reduced query diversity. To resolve this tradeoff, we propose a two-stage dynamic pruning (DP) strategy that adaptively modulates sampling probabilities at both query and document levels throughout training, prioritizing high-quality examples while maintaining access to the full training set. Evaluations across eight datasets spanning six domains demonstrate the effectiveness of both approaches: SP improves ranking over standard finetuning (NDCG@10 +0.2 points), while DP achieves the strongest performance on both ranking (NDCG@10 +1.0 points) and retrieval (Recall@20 +0.4 points), with an average rank of 1.38 across all methods. These findings scale to Qwen3-Embedding, an LLM-based dense retriever, confirming architecture-agnostic benefits. Notably, DP reaches comparable performance in less than 50\% of the training time required by standard finetuning.

效率与系统评测与基准数据与预训练data pruningdense retrievalcontrastive learningdomain adaptationOpenReview

常见合作者