paper.dinq.meAI 与前沿科学顶会 · 学术新星雷达
登录 DINQ
返回新星榜
SK

Shahar Katz

AAAI 2026COLM 2026效率与系统检索与知识强化学习与后训练安全对齐与偏好
新星分新星
65
一作贡献30
核心/参与12
方向广度13
合作网络3
1 一作 · 2 篇 · AAAI 2026 / COLM 2026

获取完整研究档案

首次获取该候选人的完整档案及 StartLux 评估共 20 积分;每位用户单独解锁,之后查看免费。主动刷新 20 积分。

联系方式

实时查找电子邮箱,费用不超过20积分;未找到邮箱不扣费。

2026 顶会论文

2
一作COLM 2026Poster· Poster Session 1· Franciscan C· #98

Fine-Tuning Was Not Broken but Diffuse: Precise Knowledge Editing via Projected Error Signals

Shahar Katz · Avi Caciularu · Lior Wolf

We show that LLM fine-tuning (FT) fails for knowledge editing due to noisy and correlated error signals, and introduce PFT, which selectively filters and smooths these signals to achieve precise, stable, and SOTA edits.

摘要

Transformer-based large language models (LLMs), trained via backpropagation on massive textual corpora, encode substantial factual knowledge, yet may also retain false or outdated associations. Prior work on factual editing in LLMs shows that fine-tuning (FT) often induces a repelling effect, degrading generalization and overwriting non-targeted knowledge, motivating alternative approaches such as rank-1 optimizations. In this work, we revisit knowledge editing in LLMs through FT by analyzing the activations and Vector-Jacobian Products (VJPs), the error signals produced during backpropagation when learning new facts. We show that each layer and token induces its own error signals, and that attempts to edit a specific association can inadvertently encourage the model to memorize the entire prompt in a diffuse or inefficient manner. Building on this analysis, we introduce Precise-FT (PFT), a method that constructs gradient updates from a small set of projected error signals most strongly associated with the learned fact, achieving strong performance across multi-knowledge editing benchmarks and LLMs.

检索与知识强化学习与后训练效率与系统LLMknowledge editingefficientOpenReview
作者位次 #2/3AAAI 2026Poster· Artificial Intelligence

AlignTree: Efficient Defense Against LLM Jailbreak Attacks

Gil Goren · Shahar Katz · Lior Wolf

安全对齐与偏好效率与系统OpenReview

常见合作者