paper.dinq.meAI 与前沿科学顶会 · 学术新星雷达
登录 DINQ
返回新星榜
JS

Jash Shah

COLM 2026检索与知识可解释性评测与基准
新星分贡献者
32
一作贡献0
核心/参与12
方向广度6
合作网络3
0 一作 · 1 篇 · COLM 2026

获取完整研究档案

首次获取该候选人的完整档案及 StartLux 评估共 20 积分;每位用户单独解锁,之后查看免费。主动刷新 20 积分。

联系方式

实时查找电子邮箱,费用不超过20积分;未找到邮箱不扣费。

2026 顶会论文

1
作者位次 #2/5COLM 2026Poster· Poster Session 3· Imperial Ballroom· #63

From Papers to Panoramas: Building Hierarchies of Scientific Literature at Scale

Muhan Gao · Jash Shah · Weiqi Wang · Kuan-Hao Huang · Daniel Khashabi

This paper introduces a hybrid framework combining embeddings and LLMs to organize scientific literature into a rich, hierarchical structure.

摘要

Scientific knowledge is growing rapidly, making it difficult to track progress and high-level conceptual links across broad disciplines. While tools like citation networks and search engines help retrieve related papers, they lack the abstraction needed to capture the density and structure of activity across subfields. We motivate the goal of organizing broad swaths of scientific literature into a high-quality hierarchical structure that spans multiple levels of abstraction---from broad domains to specific studies. Such a representation can provide insights into which fields are well-explored and which are under-explored. To achieve this goal, we develop a hybrid approach that combines efficient embedding-based clustering with LLM-based prompting, striking a balance between scalability and semantic precision. Compared to LLM-heavy methods like iterative tree construction, our approach achieves superior quality-speed trade-offs. Our hierarchies capture different dimensions of research contributions, reflecting the interdisciplinary and multifaceted nature of modern science. We evaluate its utility by measuring how effectively an LLM-based agent can navigate the hierarchy to locate target papers. Results show that our method improves interpretability and offers an alternative pathway for exploring scientific literature beyond traditional search methods.

检索与知识可解释性评测与基准Large Language Models for ScienceLiterature OrganizationOpenReview

常见合作者