paper.dinq.meAI 与前沿科学顶会 · 学术新星雷达
登录 DINQ
返回新星榜
WW

Weiqi Wang

COLM 2026×2ICLR 2026评测与基准推理强化学习与后训练效率与系统检索与知识
新星分新星
69
一作贡献30
核心/参与10
方向广度13
合作网络12
1 一作 · 3 篇 · COLM 2026 / ICLR 2026

获取完整研究档案

首次获取该候选人的完整档案及 StartLux 评估共 20 积分;每位用户单独解锁,之后查看免费。主动刷新 20 积分。

联系方式

实时查找电子邮箱,费用不超过20积分;未找到邮箱不扣费。

2026 顶会论文

3
一作COLM 2026Poster· Poster Session 1· Grand Ballroom· #109

HeaPA: Difficulty-Aware Heap Sampling and On-Policy Query Augmentation for LLM Reinforcement Learning

Weiqi Wang · Xin Liu · Binxuan Huang · Hejie Cui · Rongzhi Zhang · Changlong Yu · Shuowei Jin · Jingfeng Yang · Qingyu Yin · Zhengyang Wang · Zheng Li · Yifan Gao · Priyanka Nigam · Bing Yin · Lihong Li · Yangqiu Song

We propose HeaPA, a query side RLVR framework that combines difficulty aware heap based frontier sampling with on policy query augmentation to improve math reasoning efficiency and accuracy.

摘要

RLVR has become a standard recipe for training LLMs on reasoning tasks with verifiable outcomes, but when rollout generation dominates the cost, efficiency hinges on which prompts are sampled and when. In practice, prompt pools are often static or only weakly coupled to policy progress, so uniform sampling fails to track the moving capability frontier and wastes rollouts on regions that are already solved or still unreachable. Prior methods improve efficiency via filtering, curricula, adaptive rollout allocation, or teacher guidance, but they often assume a fixed pool, which does not support stable on-policy pool growth, or they introduce additional teacher cost and latency. In this work, we propose HEAPA (Heap Sampling and On-Policy Query Augmentation), which maintains a bounded, evolving pool, tracks the frontier with heap-based boundary sampling, grows the pool via on-policy augmentation under lightweight asynchronous validation, and stabilizes correlated queries via topology-aware pool statistics re-estimation and controlled reinsertion. Across two training corpora, two training recipes, and seven benchmarks, HEAPA consistently improves accuracy and reaches target performance with fewer computations at comparable wall-clock time. Analyses attribute the gains to frontier-focused sampling and on-policy pool growth, with more pronounced improvements at mid-to-large model scales. Our training code is publicly available at https://github.com/horizon-llm/HeaPA.

推理强化学习与后训练效率与系统reinforcement learningsamplingdata augmentationmath reasoningOpenReview
作者位次 #3/5COLM 2026Poster· Poster Session 3· Imperial Ballroom· #63

From Papers to Panoramas: Building Hierarchies of Scientific Literature at Scale

Muhan Gao · Jash Shah · Weiqi Wang · Kuan-Hao Huang · Daniel Khashabi

This paper introduces a hybrid framework combining embeddings and LLMs to organize scientific literature into a rich, hierarchical structure.

摘要

Scientific knowledge is growing rapidly, making it difficult to track progress and high-level conceptual links across broad disciplines. While tools like citation networks and search engines help retrieve related papers, they lack the abstraction needed to capture the density and structure of activity across subfields. We motivate the goal of organizing broad swaths of scientific literature into a high-quality hierarchical structure that spans multiple levels of abstraction---from broad domains to specific studies. Such a representation can provide insights into which fields are well-explored and which are under-explored. To achieve this goal, we develop a hybrid approach that combines efficient embedding-based clustering with LLM-based prompting, striking a balance between scalability and semantic precision. Compared to LLM-heavy methods like iterative tree construction, our approach achieves superior quality-speed trade-offs. Our hierarchies capture different dimensions of research contributions, reflecting the interdisciplinary and multifaceted nature of modern science. We evaluate its utility by measuring how effectively an LLM-based agent can navigate the hierarchy to locate target papers. Results show that our method improves interpretability and offers an alternative pathway for exploring scientific literature beyond traditional search methods.

检索与知识可解释性评测与基准Large Language Models for ScienceLiterature OrganizationOpenReview

常见合作者