paper.dinq.meAI 与前沿科学顶会 · 学术新星雷达
登录 DINQ
返回新星榜
GY

Gregory Yauney

COLM 2026ICLR 2026推理对齐与偏好安全多模态评测与基准
新星分新星
67
一作贡献40
核心/参与5
方向广度13
合作网络3
1 一作 · 2 篇 · COLM 2026 / ICLR 2026

获取完整研究档案

首次获取该候选人的完整档案及 StartLux 评估共 20 积分;每位用户单独解锁,之后查看免费。主动刷新 20 积分。

联系方式

实时查找电子邮箱,费用不超过20积分;未找到邮箱不扣费。

2026 顶会论文

2
作者位次 #4/5COLM 2026Poster· Poster Session 4· Imperial Ballroom· #49

Sample, Align, Synthesize: Graph-Based Response Synthesis with ConGrs

Sayan Ghosh · Shahzaib Saqib Warraich · Dhruv Tarsadiya · Gregory Yauney · Swabha Swayamdipta

We develop a method to synthesize longform responses through a simple, interpretable data structure.

摘要

Language models can be sampled multiple times to access the distribution underlying their responses, but existing methods cannot efficiently synthesize rich epistemic signals across different long-form responses. We introduce Consensus Graphs (ConGrs), a flexible DAG-based data structure that represents shared information, as well as semantic variation in a set of sampled LM responses to the same prompt. We construct ConGrs using a light-weight lexical sequence alignment algorithm from bioinformatics, supplemented by the targeted usage of a secondary LM judge. Further, we design task-dependent decoding methods to synthesize a single, final response from our ConGr data structure. Our experiments show that synthesizing responses from ConGrs improves factual precision on two biography generation tasks by up to 31% over an average response and reduces reliance on LM judges by more than 80% compared to other methods. We also use ConGrs for three refusal-based tasks requiring abstention on unanswerable queries and find that abstention rate is increased by up to 56%. We apply our approach to the MATH and AIME reasoning tasks and find an improvement over self-verification and majority vote baselines by up to 6 points of accuracy. We show that ConGrs provide a flexible method for capturing variation in LM responses and using the epistemic signals provided by response variation to synthesize more effective responses.

推理对齐与偏好安全test-time scalingreasoningfactualityhallucinationsOpenReview

常见合作者