paper.dinq.meAI 与前沿科学顶会 · 学术新星雷达
登录 DINQ
返回新星榜
SS

Swabha Swayamdipta

ICLR 2026×3COLM 2026×2可解释性评测与基准推理对齐与偏好安全
新星分资深
33
一作贡献0
核心/参与18
方向广度13
合作网络12
0 一作 · 5 篇 · ICLR 2026 / COLM 2026

获取完整研究档案

首次获取该候选人的完整档案及 StartLux 评估共 20 积分;每位用户单独解锁,之后查看免费。主动刷新 20 积分。

联系方式

实时查找电子邮箱,费用不超过20积分;未找到邮箱不扣费。

2026 顶会论文

5
作者位次 #5/5COLM 2026Poster· Poster Session 4· Imperial Ballroom· #49

Sample, Align, Synthesize: Graph-Based Response Synthesis with ConGrs

Sayan Ghosh · Shahzaib Saqib Warraich · Dhruv Tarsadiya · Gregory Yauney · Swabha Swayamdipta

We develop a method to synthesize longform responses through a simple, interpretable data structure.

摘要

Language models can be sampled multiple times to access the distribution underlying their responses, but existing methods cannot efficiently synthesize rich epistemic signals across different long-form responses. We introduce Consensus Graphs (ConGrs), a flexible DAG-based data structure that represents shared information, as well as semantic variation in a set of sampled LM responses to the same prompt. We construct ConGrs using a light-weight lexical sequence alignment algorithm from bioinformatics, supplemented by the targeted usage of a secondary LM judge. Further, we design task-dependent decoding methods to synthesize a single, final response from our ConGr data structure. Our experiments show that synthesizing responses from ConGrs improves factual precision on two biography generation tasks by up to 31% over an average response and reduces reliance on LM judges by more than 80% compared to other methods. We also use ConGrs for three refusal-based tasks requiring abstention on unanswerable queries and find that abstention rate is increased by up to 56%. We apply our approach to the MATH and AIME reasoning tasks and find an improvement over self-verification and majority vote baselines by up to 6 points of accuracy. We show that ConGrs provide a flexible method for capturing variation in LM responses and using the epistemic signals provided by response variation to synthesize more effective responses.

推理对齐与偏好安全test-time scalingreasoningfactualityhallucinationsOpenReview
作者位次 #6/8COLM 2026Poster· Poster Session 2· Franciscan C· #95

Why Fine-Tuning Encourages Hallucinations and How to Fix It

Guy Kaplan · Zorik Gekhman · Zhen Zhu · Yuval Reif · Lotem Rozner · Swabha Swayamdipta · Derek Hoiem · Roy Schwartz

SFT-induced hallucinations are factual forgetting caused by interference between new and stored entity representations, and self-distillation prevents it.

摘要

Large language models are prone to hallucinating factually incorrect statements. A key source of these errors is exposure to new factual information through supervised fine-tuning (SFT), which can increase hallucinations w.r.t. knowledge acquired during pre-training. Since these errors arise as a by-product of knowledge degradation, we explore whether established continual learning tools can mitigate them. We propose a *self-distillation*–based SFT method that facilitates effective factual learning while minimizing hallucinations w.r.t. pre-existing knowledge by regularizing output-distribution drift. We also show that when new knowledge acquisition is unnecessary, suppressing factual plasticity by freezing parameter groups preserves task performance while reducing hallucinations. Lastly, we investigate the mechanism, contrasting capacity limitations, behavior cloning, and localized interference. Our experiments show that a main driver is interference among overlapping semantic representations, which self-distillation mitigates and an associative-memory model explains: forgetting grows with the overlap between new and stored facts.

检索与知识可解释性强化学习与后训练hallucinationsupervised fine-tuningfactual knowledgecatastrophic forgettingOpenReview
作者位次 #3/3ICLR 2026Oral· Applications / Language, Speech and Dialog

How Reliable is Language Model Micro-Benchmarking?

Gregory Yauney · Shahzaib Warraich · Swabha Swayamdipta

多模态评测与基准OpenReview
作者位次 #31/64ICLR 2026Poster

TrustGen: A Platform of Dynamic Benchmarking on the Trustworthiness of Generative Foundation Models

Yue Huang · Chujie Gao · Siyuan Wu · Haoran Wang · Xiangqi Wang · Jiayi Ye · Yujun Zhou · Yanbo Wang · Jiawen Shi · Qihui Zhang · Han Bao · Zhaoyi Liu · Yuan Li · Tianrui Guan · Peiran Wang · Haomin Zhuang · Dongping Chen · Kehan Guo · Andy Zou · Bryan Hooi · Caiming Xiong · Elias Stengel-Eskin · Hongyang Zhang · Hongzhi Yin · Huan Zhang · Huaxiu Yao · Jieyu Zhang · Jaehong Yoon · Kai Shu · Ranjay Krishna · Swabha Swayamdipta · Weijia Shi · Xiang Li · Yuexing Hao · Zhihao Jia · Zhize Li · Xiuying Chen · Zhengzhong Tu · Xiyang Hu · Tianyi Zhou · Jieyu Zhao · Lichao Sun · Furong Huang · Or Cohen-Sasson · Prasanna Sattigeri · Anka Reuel · Max Lamparth · Yue Zhao · Nouha Dziri · Yu Su · Huan Sun · Heng Ji · Chaowei Xiao · Mohit Bansal · Nitesh Chawla · Jian Pei · Jianfeng Gao · Michael Backes · Philip Yu · Neil Gong · Pin-Yu Chen · Bo Li · Dawn Song · Xiangliang Zhang

评测与基准OpenReview
作者位次 #3/3ICLR 2026Oral· Social Aspects / Accountability, Transparency and Interpretability

Every Language Model Has a Forgery-Resistant Signature

Matthew Finlayson · Xiang Ren · Swabha Swayamdipta

可解释性社会与人本OpenReview

常见合作者